Programme/Investors
Investor pathway / controlled diligence

Value follows validated de-risking.

INFORM is an early-stage applied-research programme. The investable proposition depends on closing linked material, sensing, scale-up, adoption and unit-economics risks—not on extrapolating isolated literature results.

No revenue claimedNo product certificationDetailed model: restricted
Concept illustration: five concrete blocks behind panels labelled risk identification, evidence generation, controlled diligence, risk reduction and validated opportunity.
Concept illustration: five blocks along a dam wall beneath a bridge, labelled risk identification, evidence generation, diligence, de-risking and validated opportunity.
Concept illustration: a bridge and port at night under panels for an opportunity story, a risk-reduction trajectory, infrastructure asset classes, adoption indicators and unit-economics scenarios.
Concept illustration
Forward-looking information

Performance, market, cost, valuation and adoption statements are hypotheses or scenarios unless explicitly labelled as observed. Nothing on this page is an offer, forecast, product warranty or financial advice.

Current posture

What a diligent investor should see first

Maturity

Stage 1 · TRL 3–4

Pre-laboratory activation remains on hold pending evidence-gate closure. TRL is provisional and system-specific.

Evidence

Mechanism precedes result

External studies support plausible mechanisms. They do not establish INFORM strength, gauge factor, durability or cost.

Governance

Stage-gated de-risking

Claims, risks, changes, requirements and decisions are controlled so diligence can follow evidence to source.

Confidentiality

Progressive disclosure

Public boundary first; technical and commercial dossiers after identity checks, approval and NDA where appropriate.

Programme structure

Two Divisions. One Infrastructure Platform.

INFORM is structured around two complementary divisions designed to progress from an improved concrete material to an integrated infrastructure intelligence platform.

Better Concrete

Division 1 focuses on the underlying concrete system.

Its objective is to develop and validate a next-generation concrete formulation designed to deliver:

Lower embodied carbon Lower lifecycle cost Extended service life

The programme investigates how material selection, formulation and durability improvements can reduce environmental impact and whole-of-life infrastructure cost while maintaining the engineering performance required for real-world construction.

Lower-carbon demand meets lower whole-of-life cost

Government and industry are pushing for lower-carbon construction products, while asset owners need a lower-cost, longer-life model. Division 1 targets both: a formulation designed to reduce embodied carbon without raising whole-of-life cost, and durability gains that act at Phase A of De Sitter’s Law of Fives — where every $1 spent counts most.

Policy pushInfrastructure Australia recommends a common national approach to drive market demand for low-carbon solutions.
Measured baselineConstruction produces 37–64 Mt CO₂e of upfront embodied carbon a year to 2026–27; about 23% is abatable with practical strategies.
Owner economicsAsset owners need lower lifecycle cost and longer service life — fewer repair and replacement cycles.

Division 1 establishes the physical foundation.

Intelligent Concrete

Division 2 builds on the Division 1 material platform by adding embedded sensing, data acquisition and the PULSE™ digital monitoring architecture.

The objective is to enable infrastructure to provide information about its condition throughout its operational life — supporting the detection, interpretation and management of changes in structural behaviour.

Concrete Sensing Data Structural Health Insight Asset Management

Rather than relying solely on periodic inspection, Division 2 is designed to investigate whether the infrastructure itself can become an additional source of decision-grade condition data.

De Sitter’s Law of Fives

The Law of Fives holds that every $1 spent getting a concrete structure right at design and construction is as effective as $5 of preventive maintenance before corrosion starts, $25 of repair once local corrosion is active, and $125 once corrosion is generalised. Division 2 is designed to test whether continuous condition data can help asset owners act earlier on that curve — where intervention costs least.

A · Design & construction B · Preventive, before corrosion C · Repair, local corrosion D · Major repair or replacement
[ Fig 4.1a · Relative cost · log scale · after De Sitter, 1984 ] Source record · Eindhoven University of Technology ↗

Division 2 establishes the digital intelligence layer.

From Better Materials to Better Infrastructure Decisions

Division 1 asks:

Can we build concrete with a lower environmental and lifecycle burden, at competitive cost, with improved durability?

Division 2 asks:

Can that same infrastructure also tell us how it is performing throughout its life?

Together, the two divisions define the INFORM pathway:

  1. 01 Improve the material.
  2. 02 Instrument the asset.
  3. 03 Understand its condition.
  4. 04 Manage infrastructure with better information.
[ Fig 4.1 · INFORM pathway · Division 1 → Division 2 ]
Commercial logic

Material → mechanism → outcome → cost → adoption

Hover or focus a state to see the failure condition. Full detail below.
[ Fig 4.2 · Commercial logic chain ]
Link
Value hypothesis
Evidence required
Failure condition
State
Material
Low-dose conductive carbon can be produced and specified consistently.
Characterisation, batch repeatability, delivered cost and scale yield.
Variability or purification eliminates performance or cost advantage.
Mechanism
A stable conductive network produces a load-linked response.
Controls, replicates, percolation map, drift and uncertainty.
Signal is dominated by moisture, contact, ageing or noise.
Engineering outcome
The system detects a defined event with decision-grade reliability.
Blind comparator testing and field-relevant validation.
No incremental decision value over incumbent sensing or inspection.
Cost
Total delivered monitoring cost competes over the asset lifecycle.
Installed BOM, batching impact, calibration, comms, support and replacement.
Integration and assurance costs overwhelm material savings.
Adoption
Asset owners and suppliers can procure within existing assurance pathways.
Pilot references, standards map, insurer/engineer acceptance and supply QA.
Liability, specification or procurement pathway remains unresolved.
De-risking thesis

What each capital tranche would need to prove

Tranche A · Lab

Technical feasibility

Material identity, dispersion reproducibility, controls, mechanical integrity, electrical network and repeatable response.

Tranche B · System

Instrumented prototype

Electrode stability, DAQ integrity, calibration, PULSE analytics and controlled comparison against incumbent sensors.

Tranche C · Pilot

Adoption evidence

Field constructability, environmental stability, asset-owner decision value, standards pathway and a defendable delivered-cost model.

Residual uncertainty

Risks carried openly into diligence

A

Scale economics

Unknown

Independent, delivered economics for tyre-derived turbostratic graphene at relevant industrial volume are not established for INFORM.

B

Long-duration stability

Unknown

Gauge-factor and calibration stability under Australian moisture, temperature and service conditions remain unverified.

C

Standards gap

Observed gap

No Australian design standard provides a complete acceptance route for graphene-based self-sensing structural concrete.

D

Customer willingness to pay

Validation target

Avoided-cost logic must be confirmed through asset-owner pilots and procurement evidence, not market-size forecasts alone.

Enter diligence in controlled stages

Provide organisation, role, jurisdiction and intended use. Approved parties receive documents progressively as the diligence question and confidentiality level justify.