Research / collaboration

A consortium for independent capability.

INFORM seeks partners who can test the programme’s hypotheses, expose failure modes and own defined evidence packages. Collaboration is structured by work package, acceptance criteria, data rights and publication controls.

ACADEMIC · INDUSTRY · LABORATORY · ASSET OWNER
Capability map

Where external expertise enters the system

WP1–WP2

Carbon and graphene identity

Feedstock control, synthesis, Raman, XRD, microscopy, elemental analysis, surface area and batch equivalence.

WP3–WP4

Dispersion and cement science

Colloidal stability, PCE compatibility, rheology, hydration, microstructure, mechanical response and durability.

WP5

Electrical metrology

Four-electrode methods, excitation, contact resistance, polarisation, uncertainty, repeatability and environmental compensation.

WP6–WP7

DAQ and structural sensing

Instrumentation, signal integrity, controlled loading, comparator sensors, feature extraction and benchmark datasets.

WP8–WP9

Field and asset validation

Pilot design, constructability, bridge and slab use cases, digital-twin integration and asset-owner decision value.

WP10

Assurance and commercialisation

Standards, certification, LCA, TEA, procurement, IP, freedom to operate and partner commercial models.

Engagement model

How a collaboration moves from interest to evidence

01FitCapability, facility and independence mapped to a layer.
02ScopeQuestion, controls, samples and decision owner defined.
03AgreementWHS, IP, confidentiality, data and publication settled.
04ExecutionFrozen protocol, deviations and raw evidence controlled.
05ReviewIndependent interpretation and gate decision recorded.
Collaboration principles

What partners can expect

01 · OUTCOME INDEPENDENCE

Negative results remain valuable

Work is framed around falsifiable questions. A failed formulation, unstable signal or uneconomic pathway is a decision-grade result when the method is sound.

02 · PRE-REGISTRATION

Acceptance criteria precede testing

Controls, replicates, exclusions, uncertainty and success thresholds are agreed before the result is visible.

03 · TRACEABILITY

Raw data remains connected to decisions

Samples, equipment, calibration, deviations, processing and published claims retain a documented provenance chain.

04 · PUBLICATION

IP and academic publication are planned together

Foreground IP, background IP, review periods, authorship, confidential information and publication rights are resolved in the agreement.

No implied endorsement
Listing a research organisation, researcher or facility in a capability map does not establish a partnership, approval or endorsement. Confirmed relationships must be supported by an executed agreement or public statement.

Propose a defined evidence package

Identify your organisation, facility, relevant standards, proposed work package and whether you can act independently of material or equipment suppliers.

Start a research enquiry →